INFLUENCE OF OXIDE MICROSTRUCTURE ON CORROSION BEHAVIOR OF ZIRCONIUM-BASED MODEL ALLOYS
Open Access
- Author:
- Silva, Marcelo Jose Gomes da
- Graduate Program:
- Nuclear Engineering
- Degree:
- Doctor of Philosophy
- Document Type:
- Dissertation
- Date of Defense:
- July 06, 2007
- Committee Members:
- Arthur Thompson Motta, Committee Chair/Co-Chair
Barry Earl Scheetz, Committee Member
Elizabeth C Dickey, Committee Member
Kostadin Nikolov Ivanov, Committee Member
Robert J Comstock, Committee Member
Jeremy T Busby, Committee Member - Keywords:
- microstructure
zirconium oxide
zirconium model-alloys
corrosion behaviour - Abstract:
- The extensive utilization of zirconium-based alloys in fuel cladding and other reactor internal components in the nuclear power industry has led to the continuous improvement of these alloys. At the present moment, demands for better performing nuclear fuel cladding materials are increasing. Also, new reactor designs have been proposed that would require the materials to withstand even more rigorous conditions. One of the factors that limit s fuel cladding utilization in nuclear reactors is uniform corrosion and the consequent hydriding of the fuel. In an attempt to develop mechanistic understanding of the role of alloying elements in the growth of a stable protective oxide, a series of model zirconium-based alloys was prepared (Zr-xFe-yCr, Zr-xCu-yMo, Zr xNb-ySn, for various x and y, pure Zr and Zircaloy-4) and examined with advanced characterization techniques. The alloys were corrosion tested in autoclaves under three different conditions: 360oC water, 500oC steam and 500oC supercritical water in excess of 400 days. These autoclave testing conditions simulate nuclear reactor environment for both current designs (360oC water) and the new supercritical water reactor (500oC steam and 500oC supercritical water) proposed by the generation-IV initiative. The oxide films formed were systematically examined at the Advanced Photon Source using microbeam synchrotron radiation diffraction and fluorescence of cross-sectional samples to determine the oxide phases present and their crystallographic texture as a function of distance from the metal/oxide interface. Also, the overall texture of the oxide layers was investigated using synchrotron radiation diffraction in frontal geometry. The corrosion kinetics is a function of the alloy system and showed a wide range of behaviors, from immediately unstable oxide growth to stable behavior. The corrosion weight gains from testing at high temperature are a factor of five higher than those measured at 360oC but the protectiveness ranking of the alloys is similar. Measured pole figures from different oxides in different corrosion regimes showed that monoclinic oxides grow in slightly distinct directions: protective oxides grow along the (-904)m pole, wheter non-protective oxides grow along or close to the (-302)m pole. The angle in between these two directions ((-904)m and (-302)m) is about 6o. Microbeam synchrotron radiation diffraction and fluorescence was performed in the oxide layers and systematic differences are observed in protective and non-protective oxides, both near the oxide/metal interface and in the bulk of the oxide layers. The non-protective oxide interfaces show a smooth transition from metal to oxide with metal diffraction peaks disappearing as the monoclinic oxide peaks appear. In contrast, in a protective oxide, a complex structure near the oxide/metal interface was seen, showing peaks from Zr3O suboxide and a highly oriented tetragonal oxide phase with specific orientation relationships with the monoclinic oxide and the base metal. The highly oriented tetragonal phase, only present in protective oxides, is believed to be a precursor to the formation of monoclinic oxide found in the bulk of the oxide layer. This plane may promote stable growth by causing the oxide to form in a manner that maximizes occupation of the substrate surface and minimizes stress accumulation, leading to more stable oxide growth. The association seen in this work of the precursor oxide phase with protective oxides and its orientation relationship with the monoclinic oxide, combined with the difference in oxide growth direction seen between protective and non-protective oxides, is interpreted as evidence that this phase allows a more properly oriented oxide to grow, in a way that minimizes stress accumulation and therefore delays the oxide transition to larger oxide thicknesses.