<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>Environmental Justice Implications of Urban Park Discourse, Development, and Use</dc:title><dc:creator>Mullenbach, Lauren </dc:creator><dc:subject>Environmental Justice</dc:subject><dc:subject>Discourse</dc:subject><dc:subject>Urban Parks</dc:subject><dc:subject>Growth Machine</dc:subject><dc:coverage>Recreation, Park and Tourism Management</dc:coverage><dc:relation>PHD</dc:relation><dc:description>This dissertation comprises three studies which 1) critically explored discourse produced by
leaders in urban planning and parks and recreation, 2) analyzed press coverage of urban park
projects, and 3) assessed outcomes of social contact in urban parks to ascertain potential
environmental injustices. The first study used critical discourse analysis to analyze the rhetoric
and actions of dominant urban park professionals, organizations, advocates, and planners, and
found that their discourse resembles New Urbanism, with similarly unjust potential outcomes for
communities. The solutions proposed, in pursuit of more integrated communities, may not
achieve desired outcomes and simultaneously introduce procedural and recognition injustices.
The second study used comparative thematic analysis to analyze press coverage of landmark
urban park investments (i.e., the High Line, Klyde Warren Park, and the Rail Park) to understand
how the media portray urban parks, and found some evidence of growth machine boosterism,
evidence of a common cultural narrative of parks as a universal good, as well as some opposition
to the parks. The third study conducted statistical analyses of survey data from park users and
non-users and failed to entirely support or entirely refute the notion that social interaction in parks
and public spaces is associated with interpersonal trust. This dissertation supports ideas about
parks as drivers of economic growth, describes the nature of dominant urban park discourse—
including its main message and rhetorical strategies—and shows marginal empirical support for
its main message.</dc:description><dc:contributor>Andrew Justin Mowen, Dissertation Advisor/Co-Advisor</dc:contributor><dc:contributor>Andrew Justin Mowen, Committee Chair/Co-Chair</dc:contributor><dc:contributor>Birgitta L. Baker, Committee Member</dc:contributor><dc:contributor>Brendan Derrick Taff, Committee Member</dc:contributor><dc:contributor>Kathryn Jo Brasier, Outside Member</dc:contributor><dc:contributor>Brendan Derrick Taff, Program Head/Chair</dc:contributor><dc:rights>open_access</dc:rights><dc:date>2020-03-21T19:59:31Z</dc:date><dc:identifier>https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/17541lem34</dc:identifier></oai_dc:dc>