Motivational Patterns related to Work and Family Lives and Their Associated Outcomes

Open Access
Author:
Lee, Bora
Graduate Program:
Human Development and Family Studies
Degree:
Doctor of Philosophy
Document Type:
Dissertation
Date of Defense:
February 21, 2013
Committee Members:
  • Fred W Vondracek, Committee Chair
  • Peter Cm Molenaar, Committee Chair
  • David Manuel Almeida, Committee Member
  • Jeremy Staff, Committee Member
  • Erik J Porfeli, Special Member
Keywords:
  • career development
  • work-family
  • pattern approach
  • motivation
Abstract:
Contemporary career development is no longer linear, as more adults nowadays combine work and family, which makes it more challenging to devote one’s energy predominantly to work. Although the structural factors that constrain or facilitate the continuity and discontinuity of people’s work involvement are well documented, relatively less is known about the underlying processes involved in thriving work and family lives. Some work-family researchers have recently started to acknowledge the importance of understanding the processes of work-family experiences (Bianchi & Milkie, 2010; Poelmans, 2005; Powell & Greenhaus, 2010; Powell & Greenhaus, 2012). The present study used the Motivational Systems Theory (M. E. Ford, 1992) as a framework for understanding people’s work and family pursuits. M. E. Ford (1992, p. 78) conceptualized motivation as “the organized patterning of an individual’s personal goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs.” Consistent with the theoretical framework, the study’s data analytic methods also employed a pattern approach. Using data from the Youth Development Study (n = 451), the present study investigated the motivational patterns associated with work and family lives and their changes during the time from adolescence to early adulthood. Further, it tested whether stronger motivation patterns were actually associated with the achievement of work and family goals. Findings suggest that motivation is better understood as a pattern of related components than as a sole indicator. Also, a stronger motivational pattern was more likely to be associated with the achievement of desired outcomes than was a weaker motivational pattern.