SECONDARY SCHOOL AGRICULTURE TEACHERS’ PERCEIVED COMPETENCE LEVEL TOWARD EDUCATING STUDENTS WITH EDUCATIONAL CHALLENGES
Open Access
- Author:
- Bobbitt, Erica
- Graduate Program:
- Agricultural and Extension Education
- Degree:
- Doctor of Philosophy
- Document Type:
- Dissertation
- Date of Defense:
- October 03, 2011
- Committee Members:
- Connie Devine Baggett, Dissertation Advisor/Co-Advisor
Connie Devine Baggett, Committee Chair/Co-Chair
Edgar Paul Yoder, Committee Member
Patreese Donette Ingram, Committee Member
John Ewing, Committee Chair/Co-Chair
Robert Clark, Committee Member - Keywords:
- IEP
Disability
Teacher
Educational Challenges - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT The passage of Public Law 94-142 (the Education of All Handicapped Children Act) in 1975 established the rights of children with disabilities to a public school education in the least restrictive environment. Fifteen years later, it was amended and renamed the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (PL 101-476, 1990), still intended to ensure that the educational needs of children with disabilities were being met and that students were receiving appropriate services. In 2002, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) challenged state standards in reading and mathematics, requiring teacher re-orientation and focus. This was followed by further modifications of IDEA in 2004 requiring more accountability at the state and local levels, and requiring school districts to provide adequate instruction and intervention for students. These legislations required secondary school agriculture teachers to become competent in regard to educating students with educational challenges. There were three objectives for this study. The first was to compare the perceived competencies in the professional roles and development, instructional roles, knowledge, and student leadership and organization skills of secondary school agriculture teachers in Pennsylvania and North Carolina. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to determine if 16 precise competencies clustered mathematically as specific latent constructs. The second objective was to determine if a difference existed in the perceived competency levels of these roles and skills between secondary school agriculture teachers who received coursework in special education and those who did not receive coursework. The third objective was to determine if a difference existed in the perceived competency levels of these roles and skills between secondary school agriculture teachers who participated in special education workshops and those who did not. A census of secondary school agriculture teachers from the Directory of Agricultural Education 2010-2011 for each state was used. The design of the study was descriptive. The data collection instrument was divided into the five areas: professional role and development, instructional role, knowledge, leadership and organization, and personal characteristics. Participants were asked to rate their perceived levels of competency in each category using a Likert-type scale. In all, 597 questionnaires were sent by e-mail to secondary school agriculture teachers in Pennsylvania and in North Carolina. A total of 218 teachers responded to the questionnaire, 112 from Pennsylvania and 106 from North Carolina. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine relationships between nominal variables. Analysis of the data showed that no significant difference existed in the perceived competency levels of teachers who received special education coursework and those who did not. The data do suggest, however, a significant difference in perception among teachers who attended special education workshops and those who did not. Significant differences were also noted in relation to the factors of age and years of teaching; these were significant for factor 5 (self-advocacy) and factor 6 (skills and abilities). There were also significant differences apparent in the familiarity with laws applying to students with disabilities, to economically disadvantaged students, and to academically challenged students. Moreover, there were significant differences in participant responses to completing IEPs for those students.